Are you in your element?

I was lucky enough to see Sir Ken Robinson talk recently about his new book, The Element. A previous post covered the talk he did about creativity in children at the TED conference. He's a man with an important message who is also as funny as a stand-up comedian. Do see him if you get the chance.
 
Like all great management ideas, The Element is simple and yet very powerful. To be one of the minority of people who fulfill their potential you need to seek work that combines two things:
1. Something you are passionate about and love doing. Not like. Love. Your own "adventure playground", where you do something you enjoy so much it's more like play than real work.
2. Something you have a natural talent for, that you were born to do.

In my personal model, I add a third dimension:
3. Earning enough money to be happy.

When I look around me I see many examples where people are not in their Element. One friend was for many years a successful and well-paid trader in the City. But he hated his job. He was stressed, un-motivated and unfulfilled. His performance plateaued, and as the recession bit he was laid off, over-taken by younger, hungrier and more ambitious traders.

But how does The Element apply specifically to marketing?

1. Don't understand the consumer. Be the consumer.
I was trained at P&G that you could master any market if you had the data. But over time I'm not so sure. I think the best situation, when you can truly be in your Element, is when you work on a market where you ARE the consumer. This is why Nike only hire active sports people and Harley Davidson hire people who ride motorbikes. When you are the consumer you have a deep, visceral understanding of the market we call "consumer empathy".

2. Bring your whole self to work
Working in a company and on a brand you believe in makes a big difference and helps you be in your Element. When I see people like this they seem to bring their whole self to work, putting passion and enthusiasm into their work. I've seen this zeal in folk I have interviewed from Lush, Gu and Method Home. In contrast, other people hang up their real selves at the door of the office, along with their coat. They go into professional marketer mode, detached and rational. Often these people don't like their brand, don't use it and maybe don't even respect the people who do. How can they hope to create passionate users, if they don't have this passion themselves?

3. Have a plan-B
If you feel un-fulfilled in your job, and not in your Element, take control of your destiny by creating a "Plan B". Or perhaps it should be "Plan E". Take time to figure out what you really want to do to be in your Element, and start planning it now. Start right now because corporate life has become a risky business. Gone are the days of a smooth and safe ride up the company ladder, with a nicely managed career path. We now live in an age of mergers, acquisitions, cost-cutting and management re-shuffles. And this means jobs are much more vulnerable.

I recently posted about Peter de Kruif, an ex-Unilever marketer who had a Plan E. He was passionate about the Bertolli brand he worked on, and about living in Italy. Rather than take a job on the Knorr brand in the UK, he left and started his own Italian food business, Trattoria Guilia. A man in his Element.

Comments

[Michelle]

[NOTE: BEST SOLUTION YET IS AT BOTTOM OF THIS POST]That final solution doesn't work in even close to 99% of the cases becuase:1. It relies on users doing all their element finding by using document's getElementById method, which you have replaced with a method that lets you add Element 's prototyped methods to the found element. The problem is that elements can be searched for in many ways besides calling getElementById e.g. walking the DOM, getElementByTag, etc., etc.2. Your createElement method tries to do the same filtering, but what if elements are created by cloning? Or calling eval() or myriad other ways.

[Teddy]

[woops, meant to put this at bottom of priueovs post]The best way I found to do this is to build off of the original behaviors proposal (because it catches every case) but to simplify it and speed it up.I started with the suggested approach, and it did work, but reading in the .htc file and binding the behavior for all my ~800 DOM elements slowed document load by a whopping 15 seconds or more.What I discovered, after some more googling, is that the .htc file is not needed at all. The behavior can be created as part of the CSS style, so for the example given here, one could simply do this:1. Implement the if ( !window.Element ) Element = function() {}; stuff that the author did2. Create the Element.prototype.isDescendantOf (for example) as the author did3. In your IE8-only .css file (or in HTML using the if IE8 trick the author uses) do this:* { behavior: expression(this.isDescendantOf = function(){return Element.prototype.isDescendantOf .apply(this, arguments);})}Voila! That's it!

[Bagung]

why not use the inventors mehtod directly, and ask the DOM a direct question instead of playing around with words such as: isDescendantOf instead of going strait to:oKidd.parentElementand straightforwardly get its parent into the basket?!!You see, when ie was providing you the means to Fly accross the DOM, the bloody w3c was just starting to learn how to walk, and still they stumble upon them blody irrelevant nodes and empty characters exposing you to all possible accidents of the fall.or even more elegant solution, see if:oParent.children.kiddy //returns the kid if exists (kiddy is the ID of the childsame as oKiddy.parentElement // returns its parent, if kid existsoKiddy.parentElement == oParent //confirms true the kid is its true child.But this, this is overkill:Element.prototype.isDescendantOf = function( granpa ) {if ( typeof( granpa ) == 'string' ) {granpa = document.getElementById( granpa );}if ( !granpa ) {return false;}child = this;do {if (child == granpa ) {return true;}child = child.parentNode;}while ( child );return false;

[Alberta Rencontres]

I always find this to be amazingly true, without exception too, "We also need to recognize that, largely, those teachers who use technology the most effectively and lead the way with its use are also, by and large, excellent teachers with or without the technology." I've ordered my copy of 'The Element'.

[Joao Santos]

Thanks for this post David, I just saw Ken Robinson at the TED Conference, and he is so right about the need to change the way we educate people. I'm going to buy his book now!

About the 3 dimension model, it is very similar to the HEDGEHOG CONCEPT presented by Jim Collins in Good To Great Book, where he uses this model to describe what companies should do.

[Joanna Allen]

Great post, simple model put very well.

For business owners this can also support internal branding (loosely meaning - bonding with and helping to develop staff within a company). After all, if it is important for us to 'be in our element' then it translates that employees will perform far better if they too are in their element.

The biggest challenge often is convincing business owners, MDs and managers to consider this as a viable way forward toward measurable business growth. It often feels like a 'soft' solution to them - yet I feel it potentially has the most power of all.

[AliSwi]

I’m currently working on my own business plan and the process really emphasizes your point on bringing your whole self. If I’m going to build the business of my dreams it should reflect my personal values and be something I am willing to put myself behind 150%.

[asit]

Excellent post David. I can totally connect with the overall thought as I recently made a career switch driven by these considerations and yes the 3rd one -"making enough money" was also a factor. "Enough" is the keyword there , not "lots". Regards. Asit