Hot on the tracks of the recent post about Cadbury making its Dairy Milk chocolate all fair trade comes news that Mars are dialling up ethical values on their core business. In the latest ad of their corporate branding campaign, Raising the Bar, they make 2 claims:
- From early 2010 Galaxy will source its cocoa beans from Rainforest Alliance farms
- Mars is the first company to commit to having the entire cocoa supply certified by the Rainforest Alliance 2020
This is further evidence of the "mainstreaming" of ethical products by the big brands. Great to see if you give a hoot about the environment and 3rd world farmers. Not so great if you are a niche brand like Divine chocoloate where fair trade is more than a reason to believe, its your reason to be.
Worth noting some interesting points about the Mars campaign itself:
1. Stamina: I like the fact this is an ongoing campaign, not just a one-off. Earlier executions were used to launch the campaign, and talked about how all the company's products were free of "nasties" (artificial colours and ingredients)
2. BSR is becoming a "table stake": the Mars campaign is another sign that if you are a big brand and don't have a clear stance on "BSR" (brand social responsibility), then you are in danger of being left behind. Social and environmental policies are becoming the norm.
3. Corporate brand vs. product brand: interesting how Mars is focusing its BSR message on the parent brand, not the product brands. I think in this case it works, as there is a lot of commonality in base ingredients (i.e. chocoloate). It would be a waste of resource to have a fair trade message on each brand.
However, the case for company brand communication is less obvious to me in a case like Unilever, then there is a huge range of products, including some with conflicting positionings (Dove = real women without sterotypes; Axe = sterotypical women without clothing)
4. Who's the target? I wondered what the payback was on this campaign, as I didn't think your average choccie shopper would a) be reading the Sunday Times, b) care much about the message.
However, this is perhaps missing the point. The ads are probably targetted not at end consumers, but rather at:
- Exmployees: making them feel good, after getting so much bad press
- Potential new hires: make them feel more positive about the company
- Opinion formers: show Mars as a force for good, not an evil empire



Giant Eagle Prescription Drugs http://oneu2tribute.com/ - neurontin price It has also been proven to be very effective in controlling neuropathic pain that is accompanied by shingles. http://oneu2tribute.com/ - buy gabapentin online
Posted by: Amestemia | September 09, 2011 at 09:01 AM
Hi there,
As you say its a great development to see the 'normalization,' of ethical practices but I also think that this does not necessarily spell the end for 'ethical' brands. Sustainability is a moving target and as certain behaviours start to come as standard, other innovations must be found to take their place. Mars and Cadburys may today feel like fair trade makes sense for their business but they would I expect feel pretty nervous about making the same farmers shareholders in the business or even launch a bar entirely as social business. A small ethical brand could consider these options whereas a big corporate brand would perhaps find them as uncomfortable as fair trade might have seemed a few short years ago.
Posted by: David Hawksworth | April 26, 2009 at 03:28 PM